The Top Pickup Artist Forum On The Internet: Fast Seduction 101

<< newsletter archive home

fast seduction 101 promotion section

If you haven’t already visited the   ASF forum or Player Guide web board, now would be a good time to do so… Don’t forget to this site! Fast Seduction 101 now has a product review section.

A real PUA (not a poon-hound or a Playa…)
5/17/01 6:10:25 PM Eastern Daylight Time

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Sharka:
Here's my take on the Awaken Unafraid seminar:
Yes, Marknosis and Stevenosis Rule!
What an amazing weekend with Major Mark and Steve Piccus.
I thought SS was the best thing since sliced bread but you just haven't
lived till you've absorbed some of that Mark-ness and Steve-ness in a live
seminar.
Already 2 days have gone by and I still feel that rocket booster attached to
my back and the wild ride just keeps on going. I feel like a Jedi on coke
hooooaaaah!

The dynamic duo from the Trance state, not only rewired our limiting beliefs
they gave us the tools to share the wealth we uncovered during the weekend.
And guess what? Sharing the wealth feels just as good as receiving it.

The whole group had a great time, and if you can't tell yet, I did as well.

This seminar gets two thumbs up.  If you haven't done it yet and you want to
improve your skills, go see Mark and or Steve live.  Can you spell "you'll
get your money's worth, and more." That's my quick take on the seminar.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Ross:
>. So the first thing, is to recategorize her statement,
>as just a behavior

STOP!  That is the entire point; responses are often just that:
BEHAVIORS. Automatically generated by environmental cues! They are
NOT necessarily in any way reflective of what a woman will actually
DO, given a different environment or different way of looking at
things!

The major understanding to have here is not Rick's specific
responses, which are very good, to be sure. The major understanding
is that 90% of a woman's INITIAL "resistance" is really just
auto-pilot behavior. Once you take them off auto-pilot, they become
deeply suggestible and EASILY led.
>Yeah, I am 35 and I get this slow pitched softball on occasion (pointing to
>the left field bleachers...LOL). I love this one. It's one of my favorite
>topics because you can do so much to powerfully set the frame in such a
>short amount of time. These reframes work on the principal of "another
>outcome"
>i.e.: it's not what they thought it was.
>
>I often ask their age first...
>
>Lets say, she says "18"
>
>I'll say something like... "Oh my God, that's like 36 in girl years, you're
>older than me... what's up with that? Another couple years, I'll be
checking
>you into the home."  (All done with the busting their balls kind of smirk).

I like this.  Lately, I've been turning it around by bringing it up
first, as Rick does, but adding in the following

"You know, I have to tell you frankly that you seem like a nice
and sincere person, but I often have lots of trouble with girls your
age.  I'm sure YOU are not this way, but my buddy Steve and I both
say that most girls under 25 are just unbelievably flaky. They don't
do what they say they are going to, don't show up...and so, whenever
they do that, mentally, we add 5 lbs. of fat to their legs and hips
and ass and thighs and tummies...and there are lots of women YOUR age
waddling around at 300 lbs. in OUR minds."
>Then if they defend their youth..."I'm young and sexy...bla bla bla"
>I might respond..."Well, to be fair, you still have a couple of years
>left...but not too long. I mean just look at the models... these are the
>hottest
>girls going and they start at like 13 or 14, by 18 they are veterans in the
>industry, and by 22 or 23 they are already losing work to the younger and
>cuter girls. And by 25... forget it.... they are a dinosaur, I mean
>it's.....all ....over.

I think this would work with women who primarily want to be viewed
and evaluated on their looks and especially club girls/hotties/hootchy
mamas.  A girl with some serious brains might smack ya for it.
>"That's convenient, it gives you something to do when you are not with me.
I
>don't want you turning into a stalker or some kind of freak. You aren't one
>are you?"

That one, I love.
>Brother Marcus:
>  > Stephanie (from private email):
>  > I found your comment, "Your comment about feeling safe and comfortable
>  > with him is very interesting -- I think this is what most of women want
>but
>  > with the excitement still there.  The problem is that once they feel a
>guy is
>  > safe, he usually ceases to be exciting any more"
>
>What you need to do here is....build rapport, discover what she really
>wants, demonstrate by, the very nature of who you are, you have the
ultimate
>ability to give it to her, then don't. Furthermore, never give direct
>answers unless the answer is no.

I think that would work on the very women I am trying to avoid:
drama queens. If you put out cat food, don't be shocked when only
cats show up.

Occasionally or OFTEN not giving direct answers, I can get behind.
But "NEVER"? That seems to me to be bait for some seriously damaged
and deranged women, women with shitter-self-esteeming.  Ok, so you
get to bang them and use their bodies? Then what?

If you want to make chili, you have to put SOME meat in it.
>This will provide her plenty of intrigue,
>drama, and discussion topics for her girlfriends.

Too much drama = stalker.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Kallisti:
> Ebderm:
> >Hypno Bill:
> >... have read "What the hell do women really want."
> >... women want powerful men....
>
> I ask you, have you seen the movie "Titanic"?
> Why did Rose choose to die for penniless Jack
> and dump her rich, powerful, handsome, fiancé,
> who bought her the world's biggest diamond?
> Answer:
> The character Jack was 1) fun, 2) exciting, and
> 3) he was able to connect her on a deeper level.
> However, in the real world, women often seem to prefer
> jerks, who do not supply #3 above.
> Somebody, please explain.

It's not that these men are jerks, it's that they provide her with 1 and 2.
All 3 are not necessary for a short term relationship. It's been my
experience that a lot of women are involved in relationships that provide
none of these characteristics.
I think the appeal of bad boys is the appeal of a challenge. Most attractive
women have no challenges in their life socially. They want to feel that they
personally have accomplished something by winning the bad boy.
Look at your life, have there ever been any women that you were attracted
to where it just seemed too easy. They were so into you that you just felt
the longing for something more. It's a stage that we all go through when we
are exploring our sexual influence over the world. BUT everything I say is a
lie.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Joseph:
>3) he was able to connect her on a deeper level.
>However, in the real world, women often seem to prefer
>jerks, who do not supply #3 above.
>Somebody, please explain.

You need to go to the nice guys vs. jerks manifesto at www.speed-seduction.com,
where Hypno Bill will undoubtedly send you....But basically the ladies go
for jerks in the real world because the only other item available to them is
the garden variety AFC, and there is nothing worse to a female than an AFC
when she wants sex. If they want a friend to unload problems on, or someone
to boost their ego, then a chump will do fine. But Leonardo wasn't a chump
in this movie, either.
A girl meeting what she really wants (Prince Charming, Mr. Right, The PUA)
in the real world is something that usually doesn't happen in the girl's
lifetime. Why else would so many wonderful women be married to men that
can't connect with them like we PUA's can?
A girl meeting a real PUA (not a poon-hound or a Playa or a rich-playboy
type, mind you, but an SSer or similar type) is so rare that she feels like
this may be her only chance to have a real connection with a man, since all
of the men she's met in her life were sexually dull comparatively. So you
get away with alot more.
There is another part to the hero equation of the character in Titanic.
4)  Leonardo's character didn't supplicate.  (Actually he did by dieing in
the water, but that was after he'd already won her heart and the only other
option was to throw her off the friggin' piece of drift!!)

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Vlatko:
Here are some seduction related sites worth checking out:
is a recent URL and it has a great theory about alpha's.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

NightLight9:
> > Rick:
> [snip]
> I say.... "Well, if I was a woman, you would be right, I would be
ancient."
> I'd be getting you to wheel me around between my hot flashes" (all done in
a
> busting their balls kind of playfulness.) "But age doesn't matter
> for guys. It doesn't. We're not judged by that criteria. I've been dating
> the same aged girls for 15 years. Every year I get older and they stay the
same
> age, it's amazing how that works (laugh). Is it fair? No, but I don't make
> the rules, I am just very aware of what they are."
>
> Ebderm:
> I ask you, have you seen the movie "Titanic"?
> Why did Rose choose to die for penniless Jack
> and dump her rich, powerful, handsome, fiancé,
> who bought her the world's biggest diamond?
> Answer:
> The character Jack was 1) fun, 2) exciting, and
> 3) he was able to connect her on a deeper level.
> However, in the real world, women often seem to prefer
> jerks, who do not supply #3 above.
> Somebody, please explain.

Dude, that was a movie. Anyway, more to the point. You want A, B and C.
Obviously they are hard to find or you'd already have them. So A and B come
along. If A and B are compelling enough you either give up on C for a while,
or you rationalize C into existence. Since in the case you pointed out "C"
isn't even a real thing, how hard is it to create mentally.
> Joseph:
> Don Juan Pattern -[snip]
> "It will only take a second. I am Don Juan Demarco," says the Don. (This
is
> not the exact transcript, during this there is some fluff talk when she's
> asking him if he's in a circus because the movie is set in the 20th
Century
> and Don Juan is dressed like....Don Juan...but this isn't important for
SS)

Actually to a degree it is important, but only as it acts as an interrupt.
Interrupts can be very effective for transitioning into pattern language.
> Now I just usually ask if they've seen the movie and say "My favorite part
> is when Don Juan walks into the restaurant and says "Don Juan Pattern"

You use a softener in the place of an interrupt. I usually do to. But not
always. Interrupts are hard because they tend to break rapport whereas a
softener should usually build it.
> Mathieu:
>[snipped part on ruining sex for "the Italian"]
> Guess what? I think that's why she's not calling back...

NO SHIT! You completely ruined her sex life with her BF, she's probably both
scared and pissed. Anyway, be careful, you're likely to over sarge this
chick
which could end with a real head case on your hands.
> But she's Italian, she seems
> to have a good heart and her boyfriend seems to be the nicest guy and she
just
> can't hurt him or something like that. Next time I manage to see her, I am
> going to create a pattern comparing her relationship with a prison or the
> process of drowning or choking....

You are a mean bastard :-) I'm glad you're not sarging any of my female
friends...
> Maxin:
> Regarding age related questions:
> You can also add 20 years to both of your ages and ask her if it would
> still matter, ask her if she was a 40 year old woman, would she be
> concerned about being with a 55 year old man?

Be careful with this one. She may not like the either of these ideas very
much, yielding aversion.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Matt:
> My Comment: I think there is a distinction between making an effort
(where
> it is a real effort) and where when you do things for someone because you
> want to and the energy is expended comparatively effortlessly.

After spending the weekend with Markness and Steveness, I'd have to say that
the seduction portion of the program shouldn't be so much "real effort."
They only do what they want to. Ross, too. He enjoys the process of
"recruiting," even if it does require energy. As best as I can tell, they
like to play and do it a lot because they want to and they enjoy it. Not
precisely the straining effort you seem to describe (your own experience? I
hope not).

Of course, once a couple has trained each other in good ways, things can get
even better. The pleasures experienced can be applied to new behaviors (i.e.
taking out the garbage can become a pleasure anchor). The thing is, you can
enjoy giving any decent person a good feeling -- the "effort" that leads her
to want further experiences with you -- while less pleasant tasks (taking
out her garbage) are probably not needed to get that coffee meeting.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Bucky:
Lately I've been talking to lots of chicks and I'm getting
quite skilled at pure SS techniques such as patterning, themes, building
connection, rapport, etc.  But I have not yet been able to close the deal
yet. I believe it's because I don't manifest that "I'm the prize" attitude.
You've talked in the past about how attitude is one of the most important
things. Any advice on how I can manifest that attitude.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Dwayne:
I had replied to a newspaper personal ad with an NLP response.  That
generated a phone call and we spoke for over an hour... ending with us
planning a tentative date.  Before the date, she sent an email saying she
"didn't really feel a connection" and was calling off the date.  My response
was to send her the following reply to her email.  Will wait to see how/if
she responds:

* * * * * * * * *
Hi Monica

I'm surprised... because I thought we were connecting on the same wave
length.  Perhaps you didn't feel that incredible connection as we spoke and
maybe you didn't feel incredibly fascinated by what I said and as you recall
reading those words... but when you find yourself in a place where you can't
feel that incredible connection, then it is better to close off your mind
and begin to think things differently.

I am sure that a delightfully wonderful woman such as yourself has an
unlimited number of quality guys to choose from, all perhaps similar to the
relationships you are used to having, as you have had them in the past... as
those guys treat you as perhaps you've been treated and as they give you
those same emotions and experiences that you know so well... perhaps to the
point where you know them so well and can recall them just like that...  and
as you look forward to years and years of continuing those experiences like
as you have experienced in those past relationships... perhaps even
picturing yourself 30 or more years from now having what you possess right
now... and looking back at the present as the beginning of that... well, how
could I possibly compete with that?

It is always important for you to trust what is in your own mind, in your
own mind realizing that if those incredible feelings you had when we made
our acquaintance no longer exist then why would you question your own mind
when you can imagine, the way I know you can, that it is better for me to
shower my attention and affections upon another woman, and for you to follow
the direction that your heart is leading you, as you realize what you are
truly seeking in that relationship.

So... as we move on, no matter what we may encounter in the future... and
who can predict the future, who even knows how many more times the door of
opportunity will swing open for us... that at least we have had a few
enjoyable moments... even to the degree that we did... and you can always
recall those things that lead you to call and speak with me that time,
remembering those things inside your own mind as you move ahead with your
life.

Thanks for bringing a smile to my face, Monica.  I hope that, as you
consider those qualities that make you happy... that make you laugh and have
fun... and that give you safety and contentment, you will realize what you
are looking for.

My Comment: I didn't like your letter.  Too wordy, too negative, too logical
(see Rick's comments in my last email).  I don't have time to go through it
point by point, but perhaps someone else can offer some advice.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Kai:
I'd like to pass on that I'm happy with Bishop and his service. I have
just skimmed the "Complete" Unlimited Lover. I feel enthusiastic about
the sex tips I'll be trying out on my dream woman. His insights on the
relationship between a man's character and his charisma strike a chord,
too. I'm not sure what to make of the touchless orgasm yet, but overall
I'm satisfied.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Hypno Bill:
Natural Leader is a new tape for the Nice Guy. Imagine being able to have
the personal power needed to calmly call women on their B.S.  This tape has
a great reframe that gives you permission to do the things you want to do as
it helps to remove old limits. What would it be to be able to just radiate
that sense of personal power that women really like in a guy. And you might
be surprised to find that this tape also gives you have permission to
succeed with women to the point where you actually enjoy success. All at the
deepest levels of your mind.
Expect good is another new tape. Here you are able to focus your attention
on what is good in your life and give yourself praise for taking action and
learning from any flub ups. Understanding that flub ups are a natural part
of the learning process. If you were to approach an HB and make a flub up,
now with this tape you give yourself praise for approaching her. It's time
you gave yourself credit for what it is you are doing right. And then you
take any flub ups as a natural part of learning. So let me ask you what
would it feel like if you begin to make more approaches and learn from them,
so that you actually begin to have success.
My original tape was a builder of confidence, self assertion, release of
negative emotions and self image with women. This is the tape I created to
give my success a big boost in the early days of studying Speed Seduction». I
gave one to a Bro and he gave a good testimonial on This list.
The two newest tapes are recorded in stereo for best results use with stereo
headphones.
Tapes are $11.00 each shipping paid in the USA.
Send money order to
Bill Lopez
15507 S Normandie #180
Gardena, CA 90247
Or send the money via paypal to bil***z@wo***.net[ ? ]

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

Linda:
About the age thing:
When I was twenty I thought 25 was old. So 35 is, like, totally old! Almost
dead to these young thangs. And I think most people under thirty in general,
both men and females, have a problem with us old folks. They have some ugly
stereotype of people over thirty, so these kids tell me. To them, people who
are older are fat and wrinkled, uncool, boring, dress badly, use big words,
etc. And if a guy happens to physically fit that over-thirty stereotype in
that young girl's head then I guess that guy must (or at least appear to)
break that stereotype in another way (be hip to their music, or something
else important in their world) if he's going to get anywhere with her.

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

INFORMATION ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE:
This is an archive of a free e-mail list relating to seduction, maintained by "Clifford".  Your comments are requested, encouraged, and greatly appreciated (note that comments from different people are separated by IIIIIIII’s).  If you know anyone who would like to be added to the list, or if you would like to be removed from the list, send an e-mail asking to be added or removed to cli***f@cl***.com^{[ ? ]} and it will be done.  If you would like to be added to the free joke list, just ask.  For those of you unfamiliar with the references to Speed Seduction^»Â®, Clifford highly recommends your visiting http://www.seduction.com/.  For those interested in seeing the previous e-mails that were sent out ("the archives"), they are available on request to Clifford or, preferably, can be browsed and searched at the archive at http://www.fastseduction.com/cliff/.

By your accessing this archive, you understand that the information contained in within is an expression of opinions, and they should be used for personal entertainment purposes only.  You are responsible for your own behavior, and none of anything you read herein is to be considered legal or personal advice.  You also understand and agree that any products you may order as a result of your reading about them in this archive are produced and sold independently from us and that any complaints, disputes or other issues which you may have with the sponsors of these products are to be dealt with directly with said sponsors and we are not responsible in any way whatsoever for any issues which you may have with them.   If you are not in agreement with any of this, please leave his site now.

DISCLAIMERS:
This newsletter and the newsletter archive in general is reproduced here with Clifford’s permission.  Visual enhancements and search features have been added by the fastseduction.com webmaster to facilitate the reading and researching of the content.  The raw text as it appears here is exactly as it appeared in the original e-mail newsletter.  Products, services, or external web sites mentioned or linked to in this archive does not denote endorsement of those items.  The contents reprinted here are the opinion of the original writer(s) and are not necessarily the opinion of, nor endorsed by, the owner(s) or operator(s) of fastseduction.com.  The archive enhancements are generated automatically and there may be occasions where the visual cues don’t correlate exactly with the textual context; most of the time, though, the enhancements are pretty accurate.  The archive is updated as regularly as possible, whenever new newsletters are sent out.

>> back to top