<< article list
-- by Mike Pilinski --
© 2003 Kipling Kat Publishing Co. -- All Rights Reserved
http://www.highstatusmale.com/
I have a friend who's a big time gambler -- horses and sports book mostly, but he'll
take a flyer out to a casino and burn up a crap table once in a while. His playful
lifestyle has given him a unique view of reality. Here's what he told me about
betting and risking: He said that the absolute worse way to approach any game
of chance was to go in with a pre-set maximum limit in your mind of just how much money
you are willing to lose.
"I'm only gonna bet $50 -- if I lose it, forget it... I'm done. This way I can
only lose a maximum of $50! Smart guy, eh? That's not so bad,
right?..."
Notice how much energy is expended deciding how best to protect your money -- while
little consideration is given to doing whatever it takes to actually WIN? This is a
classic loser's mentality, not the "smart guy" style of play.
Why? Because it's an overriding play 'strategy' (and I use this term loosely)
that's based upon the assumption that you will probably LOSE no matter how events
ultimately unfold. There is NO consideration given as to how you're going to
win -- because in the deepest recesses of your mind you do not accept that winning is
really possible. Oh sure you might've chalked up the rare victory here and
there along the way, but in the long run you will always somehow end up the loser (you
think). So the "Big Overriding Idea" then becomes to protect
yourself against any serious losses.
My buddy calls this Playing with "Scared Money". And he has
another saying too...
SCARED MONEY ALWAYS LOSES!
Timidly, you lay down your bet and the House sweeps it away. Bye bye,
jackass. See ya again when you have another $50 bucks for me to cleave off your
wallet. It never fails. There is just no way to play the game of life in a
half-assed protective manner and ever make any real progress. The
"I'm-not-going- to-take-any-risks" approach to life is a formula for abject
failure. Plain and simple. Nature seems to abhor it, and ensures that all its
practitioners are gleefully punished with unending failure and frustration.
The *successful* gambler -- by contrast -- always remains focused on WINNING, and keeps
punching through his losses with a bulldog determination until he gets there. The
way my friend describes the process must seem terrifying to the risk adverse... if you
lose $50, you bet $100 next time. Lose that, and now you bet $200. Next
time, $400. The idea is to keep doubling your bet so that when you finally DO win it
will more than cover your previous losses. Yikes!
You see, the confident, ballsy gambler has to keep pushing harder and harder into his
losing streak with steely nerves, knowing that a WIN for him is out there
eventually. His only fear is that he goes completely bankrupt before reaching
it. But if he does bust out, well...
...there's always next time!
Lots of guys approach the game of love and romance in a similar fashion to the timid
gambler. Their "Big Overriding Idea" is to protect their EGO (their
"bet") at all costs -- and that cost usually turns out to be complete failure to
meet anyone! Instead of focusing on the importance of WINNING and being
successful, they are concerned instead on "not losing" and keeping their
self-esteem intact.
But it's exactly this kind of timid approach that turns women OFF and insures your
failure with them. Women can smell your fear -- it's as unmistakable as an open
sewer! And it screams: Low Status Male.
Bottom Line: when it comes to scoring with women, like gambling, you will lose far more
often than you win. THIS IS HOW THE DAMN GAME IS DESIGNED!!!
Understand something here: the *losses* are the payment for the win -- NOT the
"wager" that you make with your self-esteem. I repeat... you pay for
your future winnings with the losses, not with the risk to your ego that you feel you're
taking. Keep this in mind because, if you're losing on a regular basis with
women, it could be that by protecting your most valuable asset (your ego) you're
preventing yourself from laying down a bet with the REAL currency that the Game demands...
i.e., a string of setup losses.
You see, the guy playing with scared money doesn't understand that the gamblers' thrill
of winning far exceeds the agony of the losses it took to get there. Dominant
males win at the game of seduction because they NEVER play with Scared Money...
And neither should you!
INFORMATION ABOUT THIS NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE:
This is an archive of a Mike Pilinski's High Status Male articles.
Mike Pilinski is
the author of "Without Embarrassment»:
The Social Coward's Totally Fearless Seduction System"... a unique method of meeting
girls that will have you making up for wasted time spent living in shy-guy hell from the
very first moment you test it out. Check it Out Here => http://www.highstatusmale.com/.
The primary
textual contents of this archive is Copyright © 2003 by Kipling Kat Publishing Co. All
Rights Reserved. By your accessing this archive, you understand that the information
contained in within is an expression of opinions, and they should be used for personal
entertainment purposes only. You are soley responsible for any use of the ideas, concepts,
and content and will hold Kipling Kat Publishing Co. harmless.
DISCLAIMERS:
The content of this archive is reproduced here with permission from Kipling
Kat Publishing Co. Visual enhancements and search features have been added by the
fastsediction.com webmaster to facilitate the reading and researching of the content.
The raw text as it appears here is exactly as it appeared in the original context
(e-mail newsletter or published material). Products, services, or external web sites
mentioned or linked to in this archive does not denote endorsement of those items.
The contents reprinted here are the opinion of the original writer(s) and are not
necessarily the opinion of, nor endorsed by, the owner(s) or operator(s) of
fastseduction.com. The archive enhancements are generated automatically and there
may be occasions where the visual cues don't correlate exactly with the textual context;
most of the time, though, the enhancements are pretty accurate. The archive is
updated as regularly as possible, whenever new content is available.
>> back to top
