mASF post by "Erock"
posted on: mASF forum: Advanced Discussion, June 6, 2005 Hey just wanted to throw my opinion into the mix here. I won't say that I
am anywhere near the skill level of most of the guys here with direct style,
but I am far better than most of the fools I'm competing with. I yield much
more results from direct, but am now just seeing the glory in indirect.
What drew my attention to this thread was the title, "flash game." I see
nothing wrong with flash game at all. In fact, I came to this site to develop
flash game. Direct game is truly natural game». It's the game that most
naturals have and it is easier to learn, because it is simply more natural.
Flash game, on the other hand, may be harder to learn, more indirect, and
possibly yield less results, but it's more fun in my opinion.
Whenever I roll in guns blazing, cocky and funny lines spitting left and right,
it gives me a high like no other. This experience is crazy addicting, and it
makes getting chicks a little more of a challenge, but a lot more fun. In my
experience, flash game is much more impressive to your buds or your boss or
anybody else watching you work. People say things to me like, "Bro, how do you
come up with that shit." It's a lot of fun, and that's what seduction should
be: fun.
All in all, direct game does give me more results, but indirect is just so much
more exhilarating, and I enjoy my reputation as a huge mack daddy when before,
with my more direct style, people thought I was just "pretty good" with girls.
So yeah, for beginners looking to get a lot of lays, direct is probably more
natural and normal, but for the more advanced guys looking for new ways to make
seduction more interesting, indirect cocky-funny is an enjoyable ride.
Erock
-------------------------------------------
Me: Why can't most guys get girls?
Biggest player I've ever met: They soup them up but can't rock the jam
|
