mASF post by "lost_and_found"
posted on: mASF forum: Advanced Discussion, June 6, 2005Actually I meant something in the line:
-Assuming skill on the reader: C&F should be used until you reach hook point
then fase-shift onto rapport building using callbacks to funny threads develop
in the previous segment of the conversation, mostly non-sexual until the first
IOI is delivered from her and you have qualified...
-Not assuming skill on the reader: Just open the set and don't worry about the
outcome. Force your frame on her and enjoy the interaction, that must be your
outcome...
--------------
Note that most of you may not agree with the random thoughts spilled on this 2
paragraphs, depending of how you are biased. However the first one assumes you
know what the concepts described there are and know how to create several of
the things going on. First paragraph belongs to advance and second to general,
IMO.
I'm aware that the advance paragraph look a lot like MM and the second one like
a more natural approach. This is could have been easily the other way round, no
intentionality here.
On 6/8/05 10:45:00 AM, Yuri wrote:
>On 6/4/05 7:51:00 AM, lost_and_found
>wrote:
>>Taking the content down so as
>>to fit newbies pull down the
>>quality of this forum. If you
>>are advanced, don't spoon feed
>>us, let has have to workout
>>what is missing to really get
>>what you say.
>
>Reduction of content so that people can
>understand your point is necessary.
>
>If a new guy were to ask me, "What does
>C&F do?" I wouldn't give him a lengthy
>answer, I'd just say... "It demonstrates
>value."
>
>I wouldn't say.. "When you walk up to a
>girl she's feeling nervous and when you
>use cocky and funny material you are
>able to turn her on and distinguish
>yourself from other guys while at the
>same time subcommunicating intelligence
>by making her laugh, which of course
>once she laughs she will rationalize
>that she likes you anyway."
>
>No, that's a DETAILED answer. New guys
>can't understand that. They'll smile and
>nod and act like they know, but in truth
>they don't grasp the concept. They don't
>need to think about all that shit. They
>only need to think, "let me demonstrate
>value" and because that's one mental
>process less, they might be less
>nervous, etc.
>
>
>>false presuppositions
>
>What's a false presupposition? :)
Check google, the fact that I'm such a smart guy doesn't mean that I have to
answer all you questions.
There is a false presupposition there somewhere ... :-)
|
