mASF post by "Alamo"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, December 12, 2002On 12/24/02 4:00:00 AM, Jasmine wrote:
>Woman are attracted to
>powerful and wealthy men. You
>see it among the rich and
>famous all the time. Specific
>examples are an aging Michael
>Douglas bagging Zeta-Jones,
>and Hugh Hefner bagging SHB
>after SHB. If a polished PUA
>keeps himself in shape and
>exhibits the aforementioned
>characteristics in any
>meaningful degree whatsoever,
>he is going to enjoy success
>even at an older age.
In any meaningful degree....powerful and wealthy that is?
Well, ermmm, what about an average PUA (in the sense of power and wealth).
These traits attract women, and ok, it is not exactly rocket science. But I can
not believe that every PUA is to be regarded upon as being powerful (in the
"common" sense, I am not referring to internal power or self-control) nor
wealthy. Good money is one thing, wealthy is a whole different ballgame.
>Yes, there is love and life
>outside of ASF. There are
>people who actually do love
>one another enough to stay
>together. Sure, they are
>tempted to stray, but losing
>their partners is a
>consequence that they do not
>wish to risk.
Hmmm, isn't it in human nature to be tempted to stray? My point is more or
less: if they can get away with it without being caught, wouldn't the vast
majority go for it?
>I, personally, know several
>couples that have been in long
>and loving marriages. I'm sure
>most people can say the same
>thing.
Hmmm, yes. And....hmmm, no. I mean, is there any way you can know for sure that
these couples you know are not straying? For instance: I have a FB, and she is
in a pretty serious LTR, 5 years now. I am positive that people surrounding
this couple think they do not stray. See what I mean?
"The wise create their own circumstances"
|
