mASF post by "zyxwxy"
posted on: mASF forum: Field Reports Discussion, April 4, 2003In article <[email protected]>, vectorz
wrote:
> On 4/14/03 6:30:47 PM, zyxwxy wrote:
> >Face it: the OG had better skills than you, and you had no idea
> >what to do about it.
>
> Uhm, I could've sworn I said in the FR itself that he obviously
> "Had much more game than I did." What, are you just repeating
> what I pointed out?
You said it in passing, then discarded it as if it didn't matter,
when in fact you were VERY bothered by it.
> You sound more upset about this FR than I do. What is your REAL
> problem here?
My real problem is when a guy comes into this public forum to get
feedback on his issue, then he gets that feedback (very CONSISTENT
feedback from everyone, I might add), and then gets mad at US for
providing that feedback, it pisses me off.
> On one of the other seduction boards, I posted this exact same
> article and got the same iritated sounding replies just like
> yours.
Sounds like you're getting pretty much unanimous agreement on your
problem. That should tell you something.
> He than let it slip out that he was ugly and takes it personally
> and that was why he was being so nasty about it. Is this the same
> thing going on here?
Oh, this is funny.
A chick goes for another guy instead of you = the chick must be a
slut.
Guys think you're wrong = the guys must be ugly.
So everyone's screwed up but you, eh?
Not that it matters whether I'm ugly or not, but I'm actually
decent-looking. (Sorry to implode another one of your theories.)
You know who IS ugly? Most of the PU gurus are ugly. I've watched
fugly guys mack on girls I know, and I'm amused by it, because I
understand what they're doing and how it appeals to the chick. I
know it's not because the chick's a slut. (I also know how to stop
it.) I hold no illusions that simply being better looking is going
to get me the girl.
You still have some learning to do.
zyxwxy
|
