mASF post by "Trollalicious"
posted on: USENet: alt.seduction.fast newsgroup, March 3, 2002WinAtBetting wrote:
>Can't handle a free-speech debate, guys?
>
>My ideas must be more powerful than I realized.
No, this proves is that THEIR theories and methods actually WORK, since they
have much less time on their hands to post to USENET. They're actually out of
their homes, putting their theories to the test, while all you do is whine and
yell that no one takes you seriously. How can anyone take you seriously, when
your entire existence seems to be centered around USENET. You can't gain
experience with women on USENET, you have to have the balls to actually LEAVE
YOUR HOUSE occasionally, and INTERACT WITH WOMEN. You apparently do neither on
a regular basis, given your posting history.
Let me put this in a way you may understand. Let's suppose for a minute that
the powers that be at UPenn would grant you a public debate on their
employment practices. You would debate on your views, and UPenn would send
their janitor, who was hired right out of high school. Would you consider this
debate worth your while? No, you wouldn't, because the janitor has NO KNOWLEDGE
WHATSOEVER on the subject of the debate. It would be a waste of your time to
debate this guy, wouldn't it? Well, that's how the seduction "gurus" feel about
you. You are that janitor, because you have NO KNOWLEDGE WHATSOEVER on the
subject matter. It's pure comedy for you to call these guys your "rival"
<snicker> gurus, since you are NOT A GURU of seduction.
>(note: one or two of these rivals are PAYING some people to defame me
><snip the deranged ramblings of a
>paranoid little boy stuck in an
> "I'm the ruler of the world" daydream>
Again, I'll prove you wrong. No plugs for other sites. No promotion of the REAL
places to learn about seduction. Just just pointing out how childish and
idiotic you are.
>Want to get laid by beautiful women?
What straight man doesn't?
>http://www.cyber<snip>
What a sad, pathetic little boy.
---------------------------------------
Trolling Usenet since 1993
|
