The Top Pickup Artist Forum On The Internet: Fast Seduction 101

Home | 

Sexual Evolution And Language

mASF post by enigma_crux

<< Home ... < Relevance Matches ... "tyler durden"

Sexual Evolution And Language
You can search for more articles and discussions like this on the rest of this web site.

Acronyms used in this article can be looked up on the acronyms page.  To get involved in discussions like this, you can join the mASF discussion forum at fastseduction.com/discussion. [posts in this section may be edited, but only for spelling corrections and readability]

mASF post by "enigma_crux"
posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, July 7, 2005

This is my reply to a post made by motion on the NYC lair boards. I thought it
might be useful here too, so I brought it over.


Re: Sexual Evolution And Language

I’ve been occupying my mind with similar thoughts about the process of
evolution, genes and attraction. To me, it all goes like this… It is my strong
belief that we are animals first and foremost. And like the rest of the animals
our bodies are vehicles of this perplexing entity we call the genes. From a
Darwinian nature point of view things like love, friendships, relationships,
morality, evil, good, mother, father, polygamy, monogamy simply do not exist.

Here are some interesting quotes from a book I am currently reading. It is one
of DeAngelo’s picks… The Red Queen by Matt Ridley… “We confidently assert that
there is nothing in our nature that was not carefully ‘chosen’ in this way for
its ability to contribute to eventual reproductive success. This seems an
astonishingly hubristic claim. It seems to deny free will, ignore those who
choose chastity, and portray human beings as programmed robots bent only on
procreation. It seems to imply that Mozart and Shakespeare were motivated only
by sex. Yet I know of no other way that human nature can have develop except
by evolution, and there is now overwhelming evidence that there is no other way
for evolution to work except by competitive reproduction. Those strain that
reproduce persists, those that do not reproduce die out…” “There is a little
wasp that injects its eggs into whitefly aphids, where they grow into new wasps
by eating the whitefly from the inside out… If one of these wasps, upon poking
its tail into a whitefly, discovers that the aphid is already occupied by a
young wasp, then… she withholds sperm from the egg she is about to lay and lays
an unfertilized egg inside the wasp larva that is inside the whitefly. (It is
peculiarity of wasps and ants that unfertilized eggs develop into males, while
fertilized ones develop into females.) The ‘intelligent’ thing that the mother
wasp has done is to recognize that there is less to eat inside an already
occupied whitefly than in virgin territory. Her egg will therefore grow into a
small, stunted wasp. And her species, males are small, females large. So, it
was ‘clever’ of her to ‘choose’ to make her offspring male when she ‘knew’ it
was going to be small. But of course this is all nonsense. She was not
‘clever,’ she did not ‘choose’ and she ‘knew’ not what she did… She was a
minuscule wasp… She was an automaton, carrying out the simple instructions to
her neural program: If whitefly occupied, withhold sperm. Her program has been
designed by natural selection over million of years. “Our closest relatives the
chimpanzees, live in promiscuous societies in which females seek as many sexual
partners as possible and a male will kill the infants of strange females with
whom he has not mated.” Shit… That took way longer than I was expecting, but
this book is filled with brilliant words like this and I am only done with
chapter one.

This sets the right venue for me to move to my next point. Female do not choose
who they mate with. Free will is merely a complex logical rationing that has
evolved to better the genes selection of other good genes. But it really all
breaks down to beliefs and minsets. . In my opinion, it is detrimental for us
as pick-up artists-to think that women select their sexual partners. They
simply do not. In most, if not all, animal species, the alpha male has sex with
over 80% of the females of his community. The majority of the fmales only mate
with just one male during the span of her life expentancy. Who has the upper
hand in this setup? Women nor men have any saying on who they find attractive.
Attraction is not a choice. It is part of their programming. It is wiring that
is innate in us and has been for many many many years. What are the origins of
attraction? That’s too much of a deep question to answer and any answer will be
nothing but poetry. Plain and simple. I am choosing not to answer that here for
the sake of brevity. Ha, that was funny… Brevity…

Moving on, unlike the rest of our fellow animals, we possess one unique and
interesting advantage/disadvantage: a complicating language system and
communication. THIS IS FUCKING HUGE!!! The insertion of language is probably
the most perverse invention mother nature ever intended. Imagine, a large sexy
beast, with a conspicuously hairy body, an exuberant projection of dominance,
and ape-like simian drugs characteristics… Now image him being on top of a
mountain (that’s hilarious how we automatically assumed it was a dude) jumping
up and down with fury and banging on his chest… Fucking hardcore… Then all of a
sudden this lovely creature stops and mummurs “da da dada gu gu ga.” And mother
nature pats her little son on the back, bringing a new and complication
dimension to life, reproduction and the genes.

Language is both our curse and our blessing. It is because of language that
something as outlandish and far-fetched as a seduction community exits. But at
the same time, it plagues our innate and natural programming with less than
useful vague ideas and concepts. And again, I mean “less than useful” from a
Darwinian standpoint. It is just frustrating… Erhrhrh… This is why we have
concepts as complicated and abstract as love. And language itself might lead to
the deletion of the human race. I am certainly not immune to this. Feminist,
homosexuals, religion, Jesus freaks, philosophy, poets, metaphysics, God,
Satan, good, evil, Albert Camus (yuck!), Aphex Twin, Mr. Rogers, the fucking
puas… All the result of language and the overworking of the mind. EXTREMELY
UNNATURAL... And we are all going to burn in hell for it. Hahahahahaahah….
Language… A highly intricate and enigmatic pegging memory system that has the
ability to affect our nervous system and body with a simple few words. Try this
for size… Pink, wet pussy…

So in response to a post somebody replied to me earlier, everything is a
complicated version of “talk to the hand.” For better or worse, our
intelligence now plays an important role in our sexual reproduction. The mate
who has stronger beliefs and who can communicate these beliefs the better,
become the new leader. Add this to a simple understanding of sex mathematics
and women and you are fucking money. I can’t thank the community enough of this
last piece of the puzzle. It is only a matter of time before I get ridiculously
great at this. It is not “rocket science” like Tyler Durden likes to say. The
pick-up part itself is easy. The personality, intelligence, and comedy take a
lifetime to develop. This is why somebody like Style can shine like he fucking
does.

I have more to say. But I will cut my thread here and let his grow on you
mates. enigma_crux…

Name: Andy Rodriguez
Nicknames: enigma_crux, Enigma???, enigmatic_id, little peacock joe, Sleazy
Nick, camouflaged jimmy, A1010195, Dying New Yorker
Email: eni***d@ho***.com[ ? ], aar***8@co***.edu[ ? ], eni***x@ho***.com[ ? ]
AOL Instant Messenger: Sleazy Nick, A1010195, Dying New Yorker
Sites: http://www.myspace.com/enigmaticid



Unless otherwise noted, this article is Copyright©2005 by "enigma_crux" with implicit permission provided to FastSeduction.com for reproduction. Any other use is prohibited without the explicit permission of the original author.

 

 Learn The Skills StoreStore
Learn Pickup By Watching