| Theory about modern women´s bisexuality | | mASF post by zarathustra_fi | Acronyms used in this article can be looked up on the acronyms
page. To get involved in discussions like this, you can join the mASF discussion
forum at fastseduction.com/discussion.
[posts in this section may be edited, but only for spelling corrections and readability]mASF post by "zarathustra_fi"
posted on: alt.seduction.relationships, July 7, 2005On 7/21/05 7:41:00 AM, ASOK wrote:
>Well, maybe for women this is
>more true after all. Yet
>doesn't it worry you that your
>argument is so similar to the
>feminist's? Both seeing sexual
>relations as a power struggle
>primarily.
Well actually I did not know I was reframing an already existent feminist
theory. I hear about this theory about male bonding actually for the first time
from you. Actually I was never interested in feminism until I started to study
Seduction on a more scientific level. As natural I barely paid attention to the
whole feminism thing.
Franco
http://www.franco-seduction.com
Online Seduction School for Single Men, Husbands & Players
"Sarge Est Necesse, Vivere Necesse Non Est " Gnaeus Pompeius, revised
|
Unless otherwise noted, this article is Copyright©2005 by
"zarathustra_fi" with implicit permission provided to FastSeduction.com for
reproduction. Any other use is prohibited without the explicit permission of the
original author. |
| All accesses to this network and server are logged and all suspicious activity is investigated and potentially forwarded to the ISP of the connecting host. |
| Advice mailed to you weekly
Join “Pickup Arts”!
The Pickup Arts Newsletter is written by the founders of FastSeduction.com.
Get exclusive access now! |
