Acronyms used in this article can be looked up on the acronyms
page. To get involved in discussions like this, you can join the mASF discussion
forum at fastseduction.com/discussion.
[posts in this section may be edited, but only for spelling corrections and readability]
mASF post by "smooth666" posted on: mASF forum: General Discussion newsgroup, August 8, 2005On 8/11/05 5:21:00 PM, thrillseeker wrote: >My first impression is that it >could be kind of lame. It's >like by talking about PU >you're trying to distance >yourself from it, as if you >are above it and all those >guys who try to pick her up.
No, this was not the purpose at all. I just think of PU as being one of many
cool topics to talk about. Girls go to clubs to be picked-up (even if they have BFs to boost their ego). So I do not see PU as something bad in women's eyes...
>Somewhere TD talks about how >talking about the social >dynamics can be a powerful >technique, but it has to be >used with extreme caution, >cause it can come across >try-hard.
In my last vacation I discussed some unusual social dynamics in mediteranian
countries with a girl. She loved it.
>Because socially >intelligent people don't >really need to comment on this >shit, it's just obvious to >them. Like when someone >scores in sports, you're not >like, "OMG, he did XYZ. Did >you see that? >And that's all true, but by >the way they say it, I can >tell that it reaks of >jealousy. It's an attempt to >put yourself above it, but it >actually just demonstrates the >fact that you're not
Again, my attitude is more casual. Like a female opinion opener. I am not
trying to point my fingers at AFCs and make a girl laugh at them...
|
Unless otherwise noted, this article is Copyright©2005 by
"smooth666" with implicit permission provided to FastSeduction.com for
reproduction. Any other use is prohibited without the explicit permission of the
original author.