<< Seminars & Workshops Listing Page

Guidelines for Seminar Reviews posted on mASF

• First, read the Posting Guidelines on mASF in regards to posts abotu commercial products.
• Review subject line should be in the form of with "REVIEW: Product Name, [Location, Date(s)]"
• At the top of a review, introduce yourself briefly, disclaim how long you've been in the community, what your relative skill level was before the event, and how long you've been a registered member of mASF.
• Keep in mind that reviews on mASF are not meant to be subjective promotions, pitches, or testimonials.  In addition to a general "field report" of whatever depth you feel comfortable to provide, reviews posted on mASF should be objective descriptions, particularly containing the following, as best and most accurately as possible:

1. Cost, number of days, what was expected, what was offered.
2. In comparison to your skills before taking the seminar, how would you describe your new understandings and improvements, if any?
3. How well would you say the primary instructor was able to comprehend the information that was being taught?  Be descriptivae and elaborate.
4. How well did the primary instructor do in teaching the information?  Be descriptive.
5. How would you rate the quality of the presentation in terms of location, resources, take-home materials, and presentors?
6. Were resource materials provided and, if so, what was the quality of such materials?=
7. In comparison to the types of information found for free on FastSeduction.com, mASF, and other related resources, how would you compare the quality and uniqueness of information provided?  Was it worse, the same, better, and by how much?  Was the only difference that someone was presenting it to you first hand or were there additional differences and/or improvements?
8. Did you receive enough reasonable individual attention, given the nature of the event and number of other students in relationship to available instructors?
9. Extra details, if any, that readers of mASF would find useful.

Guidelines for Workshop Reviews posted on mASF

• First, read the Posting Guidelines on mASF in regards to posts abotu commercial products.
• Review subject line should be in the form of with "REVIEW: Product Name, [Location, Date(s)]"
• At the top of a review, introduce yourself briefly, disclaim how long you've been in the community, what your relative skill level was before the event, and how long you've been a registered member of mASF.
• Keep in mind that reviews on mASF are not meant to be subjective promotions, pitches, or testimonials.  In addition to a general "field report" of whatever depth you feel comfortable to provide, reviews posted on mASF should be objective descriptions, particularly containing the following, as best and most accurately as possible:

1. Cost, number of days, what was expected, what was offered.
2. In comparison to your skills before taking the seminar, how would you describe your new understandings and improvements, if any?
3. How well would you say the instructor(s) was able to comprehend the information that was being taught?  Be descriptivae and elaborate.
4. How well did the primary instructor do in teaching the information?  Be descriptive.
5. Was the primary instructor capable of displaying in field what was taught in the seminar portion, if any?
6. How well of a job did the primary instuctor do in teaching you in field?
7. How well of a job did the secondary instuctor(s), if any, do in teaching you in field?
8. How would you rate the quality of the presentation in terms of location, resources, take-home materials, and presentors?
9. Were resource materials provided and, if so, what was the quality of such materials?
10. In comparison to the types of information found for free on FastSeduction.com, mASF, and other related resources, how would you compare the quality and uniqueness of information provided?  Was it worse, the same, better, and by how much?  Was the only difference that someone was presenting it to you first hand or were there additional differences and/or improvements?
11. Did you receive enough reasonable individual attention, especially in field, given the nature of the event and number of other students in relationship to available instructors?
12. Extra details, if any, that readers of mASF would find useful.