Subject: Re: PLZ SHARE: women PU tactics that have worked!
Date: March 6th, 2004 02:56:00 PM (EST)Group: alt.seduction.fast.playettes
Author: gunwitch
Email/Info: <mASF profile>
This article is under strict © copyright rules. For personal use only.
Obviously as in all PU specifics arent helpful, for online analyzers who like
a long read its useful but other than that its just "then i said this witty
thing aint i mad social!" or "then I did this and they thought this" mind
reading non-sense.
In this case also, any examples are worthless in the same way, as I wrote in
GWM2 this would be induction based, not inference based analysis, which doesn't
work on human to human influence with any regularity.
What you need are sound principles, not examples.
Basic first fact. Women are also victim to ASD problems in seducing the men
they want, or else they would simply proposition sex and barring bag ladies and
the obese could get a hit rate of around 3 of 4 guys, regardless of his
attractiveness to her.
Basic first fact men are generally clueless to any signals sub-communicated to
them from females
and expect a "woman seducing me should be her getting naked or asking me to
fuck", as ya said, "not classy" (ASD terms or at least social conditioning that
sex must have something more than the act itself or be "not classy"
.
So what are we left with here? One rodent cannot speak, one cannot read
intent. How can they communicate?
One can learn to speak/verbalize desire(the women) or one can learn to read
and send intentions without words(the male PUA).
This is simple of course, but not the solution those who wish to cling to
their societal norms want.
So the solution is: Patience on the part of the one looking to influence is a
start. Communication through a barrier of language takes time and patience.
Basically "hanging around", its worked on me to get me in the sack with a
number of not my type chicks (short blondes, tall blondes, blondes in general,
black chicks, couple chicks with a few extra pounds, couple chicks with a few
too few years on em, some just not facially ideal, just not the tall pale
brunettes I go for).
I am not communicating any intent to them, nor looking for it from them
because they arent ideal, they wont verbalize it as they have ASD issues, so
they hang around and hang around, til something, maybe a hot chick on TV we are
watching together, maybe touching my balls as I take a piss and she is in the
front room and it gets me horny. Basically she hangs around long enough and
isnt repulsive, at some point ill get horny or turned on and "LIGHT BULB! hey
she aint too bad".
I at this point will go for a straight up GWM section 14.1 maneuver as I am a
PUA. You may in fact have to calibrate the guy at all times to see his sexual
looks at you that will finally come (from the TV hottie or ball touch etc) and
as soon as ya see it do a reverse 14.1 or "hey can I come sit/lay with you?"
deal.
Mind you no double standard here (we can say some story or script and she will
melt, chicks just need to look good) as I dont believe in creating attraction
beyond looks period for man on woman PU, only amplification of base sexual and
rapport and safety states, same as with a woman on man PU.
I usually dont get involved with the playettes board as I figure the ladies
should just do their own thing here as Jay suggests, but in this case I keep
seeing GWM recommended which maybe 1 in 200 guys can pick up on from a chick
(so its not ideal) and also was asked for examples here which I in general find
anathema to good PU. Principle over specifics, better to have one technique you
can fight with than 50 that fight with you, and field over techniques, best
preparation for an event is the event itself, is always my motto, and should be
for anyone wishing to get the best results and knowledge, male, female or
meterosexual.
"make the ho say no"
a long read its useful but other than that its just "then i said this witty
thing aint i mad social!" or "then I did this and they thought this" mind
reading non-sense.
In this case also, any examples are worthless in the same way, as I wrote in
GWM2 this would be induction based, not inference based analysis, which doesn't
work on human to human influence with any regularity.
What you need are sound principles, not examples.
Basic first fact. Women are also victim to ASD problems in seducing the men
they want, or else they would simply proposition sex and barring bag ladies and
the obese could get a hit rate of around 3 of 4 guys, regardless of his
attractiveness to her.
Basic first fact men are generally clueless to any signals sub-communicated to
them from females
and expect a "woman seducing me should be her getting naked or asking me to
fuck", as ya said, "not classy" (ASD terms or at least social conditioning that
sex must have something more than the act itself or be "not classy"
So what are we left with here? One rodent cannot speak, one cannot read
intent. How can they communicate?
One can learn to speak/verbalize desire(the women) or one can learn to read
and send intentions without words(the male PUA).
This is simple of course, but not the solution those who wish to cling to
their societal norms want.
So the solution is: Patience on the part of the one looking to influence is a
start. Communication through a barrier of language takes time and patience.
Basically "hanging around", its worked on me to get me in the sack with a
number of not my type chicks (short blondes, tall blondes, blondes in general,
black chicks, couple chicks with a few extra pounds, couple chicks with a few
too few years on em, some just not facially ideal, just not the tall pale
brunettes I go for).
I am not communicating any intent to them, nor looking for it from them
because they arent ideal, they wont verbalize it as they have ASD issues, so
they hang around and hang around, til something, maybe a hot chick on TV we are
watching together, maybe touching my balls as I take a piss and she is in the
front room and it gets me horny. Basically she hangs around long enough and
isnt repulsive, at some point ill get horny or turned on and "LIGHT BULB! hey
she aint too bad".
I at this point will go for a straight up GWM section 14.1 maneuver as I am a
PUA. You may in fact have to calibrate the guy at all times to see his sexual
looks at you that will finally come (from the TV hottie or ball touch etc) and
as soon as ya see it do a reverse 14.1 or "hey can I come sit/lay with you?"
deal.
Mind you no double standard here (we can say some story or script and she will
melt, chicks just need to look good) as I dont believe in creating attraction
beyond looks period for man on woman PU, only amplification of base sexual and
rapport and safety states, same as with a woman on man PU.
I usually dont get involved with the playettes board as I figure the ladies
should just do their own thing here as Jay suggests, but in this case I keep
seeing GWM recommended which maybe 1 in 200 guys can pick up on from a chick
(so its not ideal) and also was asked for examples here which I in general find
anathema to good PU. Principle over specifics, better to have one technique you
can fight with than 50 that fight with you, and field over techniques, best
preparation for an event is the event itself, is always my motto, and should be
for anyone wishing to get the best results and knowledge, male, female or
meterosexual.
"make the ho say no"
Log In To Add A Comment
(mASF account required)
Share or bookmark:
This post/article is de facto Copyright © 2004 by gunwitch with rights assigned to Learn The Skills Corp & FastSeduction.com. Explicit permission and full agreement to the copyright notice on FastSeduction.com is required for any reproduction.
















